Platform Comparison

Custom vs Pixieset

Pixieset leads
51.8
Custom
60.6
Pixieset
WINNER

Score Summary

Avg AI Readability
52.2 55.7
Avg Security
37.2 65.9
Avg Efficiency
56.6 61.5
Avg Total Score
51.8 60.6
Avg Structure
47.1 53.7
Avg Load Complexity
67.6 88.7
Avg Lighthouse
54.9 39.2
Best Site Score
87.6 73.8
Worst Site Score
15.7 24.3
Custom Pixieset

Performance by Industry

Average total score for each platform within shared industries.

Industry Custom Pixieset
Architecture 52.4 6 sites 64.0 2 sites
Content Creation 54.1 6 sites
Corporate-personal 47.3 86 sites 66.2 1 sites
Design 66.2 3 sites
Film & Video 59.2 1 sites
Photography 53.9 153 sites 60.0 16 sites

Comparison Insights

Overall Verdict

Pixieset meaningfully outperforms Custom by 8.8 points on average. This reflects a consistent quality gap across their sites.

Dimension Edge

Custom leads in: Lighthouse. Pixieset leads in: AI Readability, Security, Efficiency, Structure, Load Complexity. Pixieset has a broader performance advantage across dimensions.

Opportunities for improvement
  • Custom could target AI Readability, Security, Efficiency, Structure, Load Complexity to close the gap.
  • Pixieset could target Lighthouse to improve.

Industry-by-Industry Results

Pixieset wins in 3 of 6 shared industries - its overall lead holds across verticals.

Sample Size Consideration

Custom has 12.7× more audited sites than Pixieset. Larger samples surface more variation and may pull averages toward the mean, so this comparison should be read with that in mind.