Platform Comparison

Custom vs Adobe Portfolio

Custom leads
51.8
Custom
WINNER

Score Summary

Avg AI Readability
52.2 54.6
Avg Security
37.2 34.6
Avg Efficiency
56.6 55.7
Avg Total Score
51.8 50.9
Avg Structure
47.1 39.6
Avg Load Complexity
67.6 81.8
Avg Lighthouse
54.9 43.8
Best Site Score
87.6 64.9
Worst Site Score
15.7 36.0
Custom Adobe Portfolio

Performance by Industry

Average total score for each platform within shared industries.

Industry Custom Adobe Portfolio
Architecture 52.4 6 sites 50.6 4 sites
Content Creation 54.1 6 sites
Corporate-personal 47.3 86 sites 48.8 3 sites
Design 66.2 3 sites 56.3 1 sites
Photography 53.9 153 sites 51.0 17 sites

Comparison Insights

Overall Verdict

Both platforms perform at a very similar level - the 0.9-point gap is within the margin of normal variation.

Dimension Edge

Custom leads in: Security, Structure, Lighthouse. Adobe Portfolio leads in: AI Readability, Load Complexity. Custom has a broader performance advantage across dimensions.

Opportunities for improvement
  • Custom could target AI Readability, Load Complexity to close the gap.
  • Adobe Portfolio could target Security, Structure, Lighthouse to improve.

Industry-by-Industry Results

Custom wins in 3 of 5 shared industries, suggesting its advantage is consistent rather than driven by a single vertical.

Sample Size Consideration

Custom has 10.2× more audited sites than Adobe Portfolio. Larger samples surface more variation and may pull averages toward the mean, so this comparison should be read with that in mind.