Platform Comparison

Framer vs Adobe portfolio

Adobe portfolio leads
50.3
Framer
6 sites
50.9
Adobe portfolio
25 sites
WINNER

Score Summary

Avg AI Readability
42.8 54.6
Avg Security
50.0 34.6
Avg Efficiency
52.5 55.7
Avg Total Score
50.3 50.9
Avg Structure
48.7 39.6
Avg Load Complexity
48.3 81.8
Avg Lighthouse
61.8 43.8
Best Site Score
55.6 64.9
Worst Site Score
37.4 36.0
Framer Adobe portfolio

Performance by Industry

Average total score for each platform within shared industries.

Industry Framer Adobe portfolio
Architecture — —
Corporate-personal — —
Design — —
Photography — —

Comparison Insights

Overall Verdict

Both platforms perform at a very similar level - the 0.6-point gap is within the margin of normal variation.

Dimension Edge

Framer leads in: Security, Structure, Lighthouse. Adobe portfolio leads in: AI Readability, Efficiency, Load Complexity. Each platform has distinct strengths in different dimensions.

Opportunities for improvement
  • Framer could target AI Readability, Efficiency, Load Complexity to close the gap.
  • Adobe portfolio could target Security, Structure, Lighthouse to improve.

Industry-by-Industry Results

The platforms split industry wins evenly across 4 shared verticals - the overall score gap may be driven by a few outlier sites rather than a consistent pattern.

Sample Size Consideration

Adobe portfolio has 4.2× more audited sites than Framer. Larger samples surface more variation and may pull averages toward the mean, so this comparison should be read with that in mind.