Adobe portfolio vs Framer — Platform Benchmark

50.9

Adobe portfolio

25 sites

WINNER

50.3

Framer

6 sites

Score Summary

Avg AI Readability

54.6 42.8

Avg Security

34.6 50.0

Avg Efficiency

55.7 52.5

Avg Total Score

50.9 50.3

Avg Structure

39.6 48.7

Avg Load Complexity

81.8 48.3

Avg Lighthouse

43.8 61.8

Best Site Score

64.9 55.6

Worst Site Score

36.0 37.4

Adobe portfolio Framer

Performance by Industry

Average total score for each platform within shared industries.

Industry	Adobe portfolio	Framer
Architecture	—	55.0 1 sites
Corporate-personal	—	—
Design	—	46.5 3 sites
Photography	—	53.7 2 sites

Comparison Insights

Overall Verdict

Both platforms perform at a very similar level - the 0.6-point gap is within the margin of normal variation.

Dimension Edge

Adobe portfolio leads in: AI Readability, Efficiency, Load Complexity. Framer leads in: Security, Structure, Lighthouse. Each platform has distinct strengths in different dimensions.

Opportunities for improvement

Adobe portfolio could target Security, Structure, Lighthouse to close the gap.
Framer could target AI Readability, Efficiency, Load Complexity to improve.

Industry-by-Industry Results

The platforms split industry wins evenly across 4 shared verticals - the overall score gap may be driven by a few outlier sites rather than a consistent pattern.

Sample Size Consideration

Adobe portfolio has 4.2× more audited sites than Framer. Larger samples surface more variation and may pull averages toward the mean, so this comparison should be read with that in mind.