Platform Comparison

22slides vs Format

22slides leads
62.6
22slides
1 sites
WINNER
54.4
Format
73 sites

Score Summary

Avg AI Readability
59.8 54.8
Avg Security
16.7 66.5
Avg Efficiency
79.0 50.2
Avg Total Score
62.6 54.4
Avg Structure
89.3 47.4
Avg Load Complexity
75.0 50.9
Avg Lighthouse
72.0 52.4
Best Site Score
62.6 68.9
Worst Site Score
62.6 27.3
22slides Format

Performance by Industry

Average total score for each platform within shared industries.

Industry 22slides Format
Architecture — —
Corporate-personal — —
Photography — —

Comparison Insights

Overall Verdict

22slides meaningfully outperforms Format by 8.2 points on average. This reflects a consistent quality gap across their sites.

Dimension Edge

22slides leads in: AI Readability, Efficiency, Structure, Load Complexity, Lighthouse. Format leads in: Security. 22slides has a broader performance advantage across dimensions.

Opportunities for improvement
  • 22slides could target Security to close the gap.
  • Format could target AI Readability, Efficiency, Structure, Load Complexity, Lighthouse to improve.

Industry-by-Industry Results

The platforms split industry wins evenly across 3 shared verticals - the overall score gap may be driven by a few outlier sites rather than a consistent pattern.

Sample Size Consideration

Format has 73× more audited sites than 22slides. Larger samples surface more variation and may pull averages toward the mean, so this comparison should be read with that in mind.